0.2 · AI in 2 minutes, no jargon

In 2 minutes
An artificial intelligence is a program able to carry out tasks we thought were reserved for humans: writing, summarising, answering questions, translating, creating an image.
The truest image is that of the very fast, very well-read intern. It has read an enormous amount, it works in seconds, it never tires. But it needs clear instructions, it does not know your situation unless you tell it, and it can be wrong with disconcerting confidence.
The important point, the one that changes everything: an AI does not consult a store of truth. It works out what is most likely, word after word, from everything it has read. Most of the time, the most likely happens to be true. Sometimes not.
One exception, which you will see in Part I: if you ask it to search the web, Claude will read real pages and cite its sources. But that is not what it does by default. Until you have asked, assume it is answering from memory.
The image of the very fast intern still holds. But to know when to trust it, you need four more things. They will not change when the models change.
1 · It writes, it does not look things up
You read it above: it works out the most likely sequence, word after word. Of its own accord, it does not go and look for the answer anywhere. And even when it has first run a web search, it is still the one writing the answer, word after word, from what it found. Now add the consequence, which is the real lesson of this chapter.
The same mechanism produces its fine sentences and its inventions. It is not a flaw alongside a strength, it is one single thing seen from two sides. You will never be able to keep the one and remove the other.
2 · It has read a great deal, but very unevenly
It knows what it read during its training, and that training stopped at a date. Without a tool, it knows nothing of what happened afterwards: what you give it, or what it goes and finds on the web, fills that gap.
But the right question is not “does it know this subject?”. It is: has the world written a lot about it? On writing a business letter, millions of pages exist: it is excellent. On the tax regime for micro-businesses in Benin, it has read very little: it stays fluent, and it becomes fragile. The tone does not change. The reliability does.
The same goes for languages: it sometimes answers better in some than in others. What has been little written has been little read.
3 · It only sees one window
It pays attention to what you have put in front of it: the current conversation, the attached files. That space is large. It is finite.
This limit is not like the other three. The other three degrade gently, and you feel it coming. This one gives no warning: it works, it works, and then it stops working, often without any message telling you so.
And one detail that explains half the disappointments: it reads the beginning and the end better than the middle. You paste in a thirty-page commercial lease, and the clause you care about is on page seventeen: there is a good chance it will miss it. Put the essentials at the top, and say them again at the bottom.
Hence a rule that runs against intuition: giving it more does not always improve the result. Every document you add pushes the others towards the middle, that is, towards the place where it looks least closely. Two well-chosen pages are worth more than forty.
And what the window does not keep: from one conversation to the next, the model itself remembers nothing, and your corrections do not change it. They hold for the current conversation. What carries over from one conversation to the next is what the application puts back in front of it: its memory, your projects, your instructions. You will set them up in chapter 1.3.
4 · It follows the words, not the intention
It obeys short, checkable instructions remarkably well: “in three bullet points”, “under a hundred words”, “as a table”. You are far more in control than people think.
But it obeys the way it does everything else: by extending what you wrote. So there will always be a gap between what you meant and what you said. When it obeys you to the letter and the result is useless, do not repeat the instruction louder: tell it what it is for. Not “make it shorter”, but “the client has to understand my request from the very first line”.
And there is one thing it does badly by nature: exact calculation. For a total, an average, a percentage, have it done by a tool (a spreadsheet, or a calculation it runs itself) or do it again yourself. The same caution applies to reasoning in several steps: it can drift along the way. Ask to see step 2 before it carries on.
An AI is not simply reliable or unreliable. Each of these four things helps you and hinders you at the same time, and depending on the task, you are on the right side or on the wrong one. That is what this handbook calls calibrating your trust: task by task, not once and for all.
And a rule that will serve you every day: the false hides in the precise. General reasoning is rarely wrong. An article number, a date, an amount to the nearest euro, a proper name, a link: that is where it breaks. The more precise a claim, the more it deserves checking.
And it gets things wrong less and less often. That is precisely why people forget to check.
You will see this rule at work in chapter 4.4, with the story of the twelve invoices, told the right way round.
One last thing, and it is the reason this chapter quotes no version number. These four properties, as Anthropic's documentation puts it, “stay stable even as models improve”. The boundaries move every two months. The mechanics do not.
Let's do it together
Nothing to install for this chapter. Three ideas to anchor, and they will serve you through all the rest of the handbook.
- Read this sentence twice: an AI predicts a plausible answer, it does not consult a store of truth.
- Remember the consequence. When it does not know, it does not stop: it invents something credible. This is called a hallucination. It is not a rare bug, it is normal behaviour pushed to its limits.
- Remember the reflex. For anything that really counts, a figure, a date, a reference, a point of law, a piece of medical information: you check elsewhere. For the rest, you can move fast.
An AI that invents gives no warning. It changes neither tone nor style, and the false is written as well as the true. That is precisely what makes checking necessary: you cannot spot an error from the way it is written.
The seven words you will come across
Before going further, seven words. Seven, not fifty: these are the ones that turn up everywhere from the first hour, and knowing them will stop you getting stuck on a menu or a message.
You will come across other words: MCP, agent, canvas, Plan mode. You do not have to learn them now: each one is explained where it is useful, at the moment you need it.
And if a word blocks you along the way, the full glossary is in appendix A, with fifty-one terms. It is also in the troubleshooting file delivered with this handbook, where you can search for it by typing the word.
What you do not hand over to an AI
You will soon be putting your own documents into Claude, and that is the whole point. One simple rule before you go there: what you write is sent to the publisher's servers. There is nothing worrying about that for a set of meeting notes. There is rather more for these five things.
- Passwords, codes, access keys. Never, whatever the tool.
- Identity documents and official numbers.
- Health data, yours or anyone else's.
- Personal data belonging to your clients or colleagues that you have no right to pass on. Anonymise before pasting.
- Professional secrets covered by a confidentiality agreement.
For everything else, your notes, your drafts, your ordinary working documents: go ahead. And do go and look once, in your Claude account settings, at the section on using your data to improve the models: the setting exists, it changes with one click, and it is better to have seen it now than to discover it in six months.
Find a field you genuinely know well: your job, a passion, your town, a sport. Note it next to your sentence from chapter 0.1.
We will use it in the next chapter. It is the best training ground there is: on a subject you have mastered, you spot immediately when the AI is right and when it is padding.
- Your field is precise enough for you to correct a mistake in it (“accounting for small businesses”, not “work”).
- You can explain in one sentence, to someone else, why an AI can be confidently wrong.
- You can name two things you will never paste into a conversation.
- Believing everything the AI says because it is well written. How well something is put says nothing about whether the content is accurate.
- Thinking it understands the way a human does. It works out probabilities, it does not understand. That takes nothing away from its usefulness, but it explains its mistakes.
- An AI carries out everyday human tasks: writing, summarising, answering, creating.
- It offers the likely, not the true. When it does not know, it invents without warning.
- What matters gets checked elsewhere.
- Passwords, identity documents, health, third-party data, professional secrets: they do not go in.
The rest of the handbook covers Claude, Higgsfield, Claude Design and Claude Code, with 11 recipes and a 30-day programme.
Hear about it when the handbook changes
The handbook gets reworked as the tools change: new versions, screens that move, recipes brought back up to date. If you want to hear about it when that happens, leave your address.
Your address is used only to announce updates to the handbook. It is never sold or passed on. To unsubscribe, write to contact@atelieriacomplet.com. Personal data
It is optional: the free sample stays readable with no account and no email address, and nothing closes if you skip this.

This handbook is not an expert's course: it is the roadmap of my own learning of these tools, written for the least technical among us.
Read the full story